Foster Children Living Years in the System
I had a case of a baby that the biological parents were asked about family members at each visit, they responded there was not anyone, but after a year when the termination of parental rights went to court they start throwing names of cousins, sister, aunts, etc that could be an option for the baby. Funny thing is, I do not think these family members appeared overnight.
What made it okay for this baby to live her first year in foster care but in the eleventh hour the biological parents decide to get involved? Wouldn’t it be in the best interest of the children to be placed with the biological family members from the beginning not just when it is convenient for the biological parents?
Some biological parents do not even want to go down the biological family members’ route. Child welfare caseworkers are left to try to track down family members own. This can be a lengthy process for the foster children in care, waiting. Personally, I have only been involved with one case where the biological mother after some time, supported her daughter going to her mother in another state. Her daughter ended up spending a year living in foster care because she did not want her daughter going to her mother. Other cases I have been involved with where the biological mothers were totally against the child or children being placed with other family members and with the biological father in one case, the mother was totally against the placement.
SPONSOR
Here should be the real question, “Is it possible for the foster child’s time to be limited in foster care or until he or she is placed up for adoption?” That would have to take the foster care system and the biological parents to decide to put the children’s needs first.
For information/instructions on how to subscribe FREE to your favorite AdoptionBlogs, please visit
this link.
More reading:
Should Foster Parents Bond With Their Foster Children?
Opposing Foster Parents Bonding With Foster Children